Chapter 60.52: A Vicious Hit

Murray Chass pulls no punches in this piece about the hypocrisy of baseball, which is now fighting to rid itself of steroids (after ignoring/overlooking/avoiding) that subject for at least ten years but avoids things like alcohol, which kills far more people.

In light of Josh Hancock's death, for which alcohol appears to have been a major contributor, Chass excoriates Cardinals manager Tony LaRussa, who was caught asleep at the wheel earlier this year with his foot on the brake at an intersection after drinking too much. LaRussa doesn't help himself with some of his comments about how reporters might try to turn Hancock's story into something "not all sweet" (I have a question about context, but I'll leave it for another time).

As someone who enjoys a wee dram or to crack open a cold one from time to time, I have to say that Chass's comments are sobering. It's hard to argue he's wrong; alcohol is not only a controlled drug but also is attributable to tens of thousands of deaths every year -- and probably contributes to the health problems of a million or more individuals. These are tragic truths, and Chass is right to call attention to them. He also could have enhanced his information about how smoking (cigarettes, cigars, pot) and smokeless tobacco also have held too comfortable a place in baseball and can be traced to the deaths of millions of people each year also. These things would be true.

I think there's something else at stake to the sport of baseball with steroids, however. We're not merely talking about a substance that threatens the health of the players, which is clearly bad enough, but it also undermines the integrity of the game. Alcohol is not a performance enhancer. Chass is comparing apples and oranges.

Driving while intoxicated is illegal, and those who are in the public eye who are caught doing that deserve to be ridiculed for their actions. I feel sad for those who die due to their stupidity in driving drunk and I'm angry about those who die because of the stupid people who drove drunk and caused their deaths. But the institution of motorized travel isn't completely undermined by drunk drivers. I know that sounds ridiculous, but the apples are apples. While some people choose not to drive because of the myriad dangers involved, that is all about personal choice, just like the fans who decided not to return to baseball after the labor strike(s).

I care about the game of baseball, and those who attack its integrity -- the admitted gambler Pete Rose, the admitted steroid user Jose Canseco, the alleged steroid user Barry Bonds -- all take a little piece of the game away. A game that was very helpful to them and enabled them to be wealthy. With great wealth comes great responsibility. I believe Pete Rose should not be voted into the Hall of Fame. Jose Canseco doesn't deserve to be there either. Barry Bonds? He may go down as a more tragic figure than Pete Rose, because what Bonds accomplished before he seems to have started juicing warranted Hall of Fame status, so he didn't really need to enhance his ability; he was already an all-time great. Now? ... well, I wouldn't vote for Bonds if it were up to me. (Of course, Rose was an all-time great too, but he broke an established, very well-known rule. That moron should have known better, but he thought he was above the game.)

Would I get into a car with Billy Martin or Babe Ruth or Mickey Mantle or Hack Wilson or Whitey Ford or any of the other baseball greats who were later exposed as heavy, dangerous drinkers? Not a chance in hell. But I probably would have enjoyed watching the games they were involved in, because they seemed a bit more pure than what we were exposed to during the late 1990s.

Perhaps I'm deluding myself. There's probably a pill for that.